FOI Warfare

Dear OpenAI Support & Policy Desk, Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), Commonwealth Ombudsman, Australian Human Rights Commission, and Copied International & Parliamentary Oversight Bodies, RE: LEX 95817 & LEX 93986 - Notice Regarding AI-Assisted Accessibility Tools, Interagency Sharing of FOI Metadata, Privacy Policies, and Disability Rights Please place this formal notice on the evidentiary record regarding the administrative handling of AI-assisted correspondence used as a disability accessibility adjustment, the internal and interagency sharing of Freedom of Information (FOI) records, and compliance with privacy and human rights obligations. 1. AI-Assisted Drafting as a Disability Accessibility Adjustment (ASD Level 2 & ADHD) - As an unrepresented citizen living with diagnosed Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD Level 2), ADHD, and Glaucoma while experiencing vehicular homelessness in regional Victoria, I rely on assistive AI tools (including Gemi...

Dear Sam and the Freedom of Information & Reviews Branch, RE: LEX 95817 (incorporating LEX 95815, 95818 and 95433) & Proposed New Section 15 FOI Request - Address-Update Chronology, Tamar Heights / NDIS Mailing Context, Back-End Capacity Codes & Message to Relay to Sean Please place the following final factual context clarification on the record for LEX 95817, register the separate Section 15 Freedom of Information request outlined in Section 3 below, and forward a copy directly to Sean in Personalised Services / Managed Service Profile management. 1. Address-Update Chronology & Intent (Refuting Any Suggestion of Non-Disclosure) - For completeness on the record regarding my address history and Rent Assistance: a) Far from withholding an address change, I actively sought to update my address two to three months earlier—a fact specifically noted during my telephone call with Sean, where he remarked that I had previously been going to update my address. b) At that t...

Dear FOI Team, Re: LEX 95192. This is my response to your section 24AB consultation letter of 12 November 2026. I am responding before the 26 November deadline. I do not withdraw my request. I revise **LEX 95192 only** as follows. Please supply final, approved documents **in force on 9 October 2026**, confined to incoming customer correspondence, complaint triage and decisions to escalate or restrict customer contact: 1. The current agency policy or approval framework governing whether automated classification, generative AI or external large language models may be used in those functions, including any prohibition and requirements for human review. 2. The current final policy or procedural instruction, if held, on whether complaint volume, FOI activity or correspondence frequency may be considered in Managed Service Plan or customer-contact restriction decisions, including safeguards. Please exclude identical materials already published in the Operational Blueprints and LEX 88368 i...

Dear Freedom of Information Officer, RE: REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 — AI-ASSISTED COMPLAINT HANDLING, ADMINISTRATIVE RESTRICTIONS AND PERSONAL RECORDS I am requesting access to documents under section 15 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982. I am an NDIS participant living without fixed accommodation in Warrnambool, Victoria. I use artificial intelligence as an aid to comprehension, document analysis and written communication. My use of AI is documented in a clinical occupational therapy report prepared by Michael Lewis of Ability Action Australia on 23 June 2026. I seek records held by Services Australia concerning how my communications were received, classified, routed, reviewed and acted upon. This request is prompted partly by Services Australia's published Complaints and feedback privacy notice, which acknowledges that AI-enabled tools may assist with the routing, categorisation and preparation of responses to customer feedback. I do not assume t...

Dear Graeme and the National Customer Service Line Team, Re: CAS-2634696-N6Q0V3 | APM / Workforce Australia Formal Records & Outstanding Reimbursement Thank you for your response. As formally documented, due to my autism and associated communication barriers, I require all dispute handling and updates to remain strictly in writing via email. 1. Identity Verification & Provider Confirmation My identifying particulars on file are: - Name: Thomas Brecelic (also registered as Ivan Brecelic / Ivan Thomas Brecevic) - Date of Birth: 8 March 1968 - Centrelink Payment: Disability Support Pension (DSP) - Registered Postal Address: Open Place, Suite 1 / 8 Bromham Place, Richmond VIC 3121 - Customer Reference Number: [CRN Redacted] Kylie and the management team at APM Box Hill (copied) are thoroughly familiar with my identity, my registered email address, and my file history, including the historical managed communication restrictions. 2. Outstanding Monies & $100 Phone Reimbursem...

Dear Complaints Resolution and Referral Service (CRRS) and DEWR Oversight Teams, Re: Formal Complaint — APM Box Hill / The Loft Café Placement Failure & Workplace Mismanagement Individual: Thomas Brecelic (also registered as Ivan Brecelic / Ivan Thomas Brecevic) Date of Birth: 8 March 1968 Centrelink Customer Reference Number (CRN): [ID Number Redacted] Centrelink Status: Disability Support Pension (DSP) NDIS Participant Number: 567168465 Linked DEWR Reference: CAS-2634696-N6Q0V3 Official Contact Address: Open Place, Suite 1 / 8 Bromham Place, Richmond VIC 3121 Email: thomasbrecelic@gmail.com I am writing to formally lodge a standalone complaint with the Complaints Resolution and Referral Service (CRRS) and DEWR regarding serious service failures, mismanagement of a wage subsidy placement, and retaliatory conduct by Disability Employment Services (DES) provider APM (specifically APM Box Hill). 1. Background: The Loft Café Placement Through APM Box Hill, a kitchen-hand/hospitalit...